Cybersecurity for
Healthcare Providers

Clinical continuity first. We secure patient records, hospital information systems and connected medical devices without introducing risk to the care being delivered around them.

Two doctors reviewing patient information on a tablet in a clinic

What Security Means
In Healthcare

Patient records are the most sensitive data you hold.

Healthcare carries a constraint most sectors do not: the systems that most need securing are the ones that cannot be interrupted, and the consequence of getting it wrong is clinical rather than commercial. A scan that takes an imaging modality offline is not an acceptable cost of an assessment.

It also carries the most sensitive data category in the Act. Health records are sensitive personal data, which raises the bar on lawful basis, access control, retention and onward disclosure — to laboratories, insurers, third-party administrators and national claims platforms alike.

Our healthcare work is passive and clinically-aware by default. We map the estate from traffic and configuration rather than active probing, run any active testing against non-production systems or inside agreed windows, and prioritise the two things that most reliably protect patients: the ability to keep operating through a ransomware event, and control over who can reach patient records.

Where Healthcare
Actually Gets Hit

Ransomware halting clinical operations

In a hospital the impact is not data loss but the loss of the systems care is delivered through — records, orders, results, scheduling. Documented downtime procedures and a measured restore time are patient-safety controls, not IT ones.

Connected medical devices and imaging

Modalities, monitors and the systems that store and distribute images frequently run unpatchable software on flat networks, sometimes reachable from general staff areas. Segmentation and monitoring carry these assets where patching cannot.

Shared clinical credentials

Credential sharing on wards is a response to real workflow pressure — a clinician cannot stop to re-authenticate mid-procedure. The answer is authentication designed for the workflow, not a policy telling staff to work slower.

Patient record exfiltration

Bulk export capability inside hospital information systems, often held by a wider group than anyone intends, is the most direct path to a large personal data breach. Export should be constrained, logged and alerted on.

Email compromise against administration

Finance and procurement functions in hospitals are targeted the same way as anywhere else, with the added consequence that a compromised mailbox in a clinical organisation usually contains patient information.

Third-party clinical and claims integrations

Laboratories, pharmacies, referral partners, insurers and claims platforms all exchange patient data with you. Each interface needs its own authentication, its own minimum-necessary data scope and its own breach-notification route back to you.

Built Around
Your Constraints

The sequence below is what a healthcare engagement looks like in practice — shaped by what your environment can and cannot tolerate.

Talk to our Healthcare team
01

Assess without touching patient care

Passive network discovery, configuration review and interviews come first. Anything active is scoped, scheduled and authorised separately, with clinical engineering involved in the decision rather than informed of it.

02

Make ransomware survivable

We verify that a backup copy exists which production credentials cannot delete, rehearse a restore of a clinical system, measure how long it actually takes, and write the downtime procedures that cover the gap.

03

Segment the device estate

Medical devices move into their own zones with explicitly permitted flows, so an unpatchable modality stops being an open route into the record system and becomes a monitored, contained asset.

04

Build the privacy evidence

A data map covering every system holding health data, retention rules that are enforced rather than documented, a working process for data subject requests, and a notification runbook that meets the seventy-two-hour clock.

What You Are
Held To

Each of these is a published instrument you can read. We map findings to them directly, so an assessment feeds your audit and supervisory cycle instead of sitting beside it.

Data Protection Act, 2019
Health data is sensitive personal data, attracting stricter processing conditions. Breach notification to the Data Commissioner runs to seventy-two hours from awareness, with written communication to affected patients.
Health Act, 2017
Establishes patient rights over the confidentiality of health information held by providers, including the conditions under which it may be disclosed.
Data Protection (Health) Regulations
Sector-specific subsidiary rules on the processing of health data in Kenya, relevant to any provider, insurer or health-tech platform handling patient records.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and IEC 80001
The first structures the overall management system; the second addresses risk management for IT networks incorporating medical devices, which is the part general IT security guidance omits.

Reading For
Healthcare Teams

All publications

What Healthcare Clients
Ask First

Our default approach is passive and changes nothing. Where active testing adds value we scope it to non-production systems or an agreed window, with clinical engineering sign-off and defined stop conditions before anything begins.
Patching is rarely the first answer in healthcare. A tightly defined network zone, explicitly permitted flows, monitoring on those flows and no direct reachability from general IT will carry an unpatchable device safely for years, turning replacement into a planned capital decision.
Yes. For platforms the emphasis shifts toward application and API testing, multi-tenancy isolation and the controller-processor analysis across your provider customers — but the sensitivity of the data and the obligations around it are the same.